DLR Online Special Features

Please visit here for a list of special feature editions of the DLR Online.


Events & Announcements

Mar. 10, 2019 - The Denver Law Review will soon be accepting submissions for the 2019 Emerging Scholar Award. For details on the award including eligibility, award information, and submission instructions, please review this document. We look forward to reviewing all submissions!


Jan. 9, 2019 - The Denver Law Review is pleased to open registration for our 2019 Symposium, Driven by Data: Empirical Studies in Civil Litigation and Health Law. We have a top-class list of speakers for this year's symposium and we look forward to seeing you there! Register by following this link.


Apr. 4, 2018 - The Denver Law Review is currently accepting submissions for its Recent Developments in the Tenth Circuit issue. For details on the issue and submission instructions, please review this document. We look forward to reviewing all submissions!


Subscriptions and Submissions

For information on how to subscribe to the Denver Law Review, please click here.

For the guidelines on how to submit an article to the Denver Law Review, please click here.

« Part Two: Connecting Laypeople with the Law Through Blogs | Main
Wednesday
Oct142009

Legal Scholarship in the Internet Age: An Introduction

This post begins a five-part series examining legal scholarship in the electronic world.  Parts II-V will appear during the next two weeks.

This series marks the formal launching of the Denver University Law Review’s online supplement, DULR Online. The DU Law Review is not the first to test the utility of an online counterpart to a law journal; several other journals have already established online forums.  Despite this growing trend, many questions about the role of electronic resources in legal scholarship remain unanswered.

This series aims to expand upon a few of the issues surrounding online legal scholarship. Dave Kopel begins the discussion by examining how online resources enable the direct and relatively unfiltered dissemination of ideas to students, scholars, and laypeople.  Mr. Kopel compares this to the use and later abandonment of “law French” during the thirteenth century.

Professor Sam Kamin follows with a discussion of how blogs and online supplements can aid in the development of “traditional” legal scholarship.  Professor Kamin discusses two useful ways in which blogs and the like can aid in a traditional law journal article: first, by serving as a preliminary research tool, and second, by vetting poor and preempted ideas early in the writing stage.

Professor Alan Chen then discusses the uncertain role blogs and online supplements play in academic retention and recruitment decisions.  Professor Chen, who serves as the Associate Dean for Faculty Scholarship at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, argues academic institutions should judge scholarship less by the forum in which it appears and more by the quality of thought and presentation.

Finally, third year law student Joe Aguilar notes the vastly under-explored benefits that blogs and supplements can provide to law students.  Mr. Aguilar serves as Editor in Chief of The Race to the Bottom, the first student–faculty collaborative law blog.  Mr. Aguilar argues that blogs afford an underutilized opportunity for student editors to hone research and writing skills—much like traditional law journals.  Mr. Aguilar concludes by suggesting more law schools should develop collaborative faculty–student blogs to capitalize on this cost-effective resource.

On this occasion it is worth recognizing the uncertain role that blogs and online supplements might play in scholarship’s evolutionary timeline.  In an essay written for a symposium on the topic, prolific scholar and blogger Orin Kerr noted that commentators (and commenters) should not blindly exalt blogs as the end solution to all that ails legal scholarship.  Professor Kerr appropriately reminds his audience that “technology is a moving target,” and warned not to forget the rise and fall of the last “transformative technology” widely predicted to revolutionize legal dialogue—the listserv.

Of course, Professor Kerr is right to suggest that a yet-undiscovered medium (or media) might someday supplant blogs and online supplements, but that doesn’t mean we should dismiss non-traditional means of disseminating ideas as impermanent.  If anything, Professor Kerr’s example undermines the importance of electronic scholarship: the listserv, after all, was an early attempt to rapidly disseminate ideas to a targeted audience while encouraging dialogue.  Technology seems particularly apt at achieving these aims, and blogs appear, at the very least, to be an important step in that direction.

So while blogs too might someday be relegated to a dusty shelf in history’s attic (joining the wagon wheel, the typewriter, and the suitcase-sized cell phone), it is fair to assume that whatever new medium takes hold will likely only improve the mousetrap.  Technology, while transient, tends to ratchet; as legal scholarship increasingly takes place online, it’s hard to imagine it coming back off.

 

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: www.growlegally.ca
    Teacher Kamin talks about two valuable courses in which writes and so forth can help in a conventional law diary article, to start with, by serving as a preparatory exploration instrument, and second, by checking poor and acquired thoughts right on time in the composition stage.
  • Response
    Response: EssayHelpDeal UK
    a secretly financed and oversaw grant can have what capabilities it needs. Schools may decline to recognize it, however that is another issue. In the u.s., an administration run school, or a tuition based school that acknowledges government cash is distinctive. They are restricted in light of the fact that statutes, ...
  • Response
  • Response
    Response: breezewriting.com
    Ummm, I don't think gender problem solution is in an equal number of male and female politicians. When it comes to politics, not the gender is the problem but politicians. Intelligence, principles, ideas, targets, personal strengths is way more important because matching these qualities makes you a productive for the society ...

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.